|70s Sci-Fi Art (@70sscifiart)|
Download the Twitter app
Sent from my iPhone
|Aftermath, casein, 12 x 16 inches, by James Gurney|
Salvador Dalí (Spanish Catalan, 1904-1989)
Illustrations for Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland, gouache, 1969
Amsterdam-based illustrator Leonie Bos' architectural forms are minimal and modernist, and their simplicity is what makes them so appealing. Taking influence from traditional printmaking, Leonie's digital images are created by layering semi-transparent colour areas to create new shades and tones. The off-white grain of the paper is just as important to Leonie, and she often consciously leaves patches and squares ink free. Texture as a whole seems vital to her work, with rough gradients of colour giving the impression the images have been printed on concrete.
|Lilian Braithwaite by Harold Speed|
|Morelli, Temptation of St. Anthony|
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."
– Theodore Roosevelt
Every day of teaching, for me, is a risky day – a careful day. That's probably true of all teachers.
As for me, I lead critiques, which can be so helpful, yet so dangerous. Students put their homework on the wall – their personal creations – their own ideas- and face public scutiny. My job is to take it from there.
I've said many times that "crit" is not short for "criticism" – it's short for "critique". A crit should always be a learning excercise -a practice through which students learn how their work is seen through discussion with others. It's where they learn of the infinite possibilities through observation of what everyone else created. And it's where they learn how to improve through instruction and suggestion.
But, day after day, I'm reminded that critiques can be risky. Students can feel judged – and can take things personaly – no matter how many times we're advised otherwise. It's human nature.
It's a tightrope we walk in critiques. Which leads me back to the quotation above, which is new to me, and very instructive for instructors.
Always remember that what matters is the doer – the maker. They have faced the blank page. They have faced their limits. They are the ones being discussed.
It's easy to criticize, but it's trickier to critique. And the difference is everything. It's education.